Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission HEIDRICK AND WOODLEY-0668 (Online)

Submission By Bill Heidrick and Kathleen Woodley
AddressZeballos, BC,
Organization
Date20040617
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
We are in favour of moving to a Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) voting system similar to that recommended by the Law Commission of Canada for our country, and which has been implemented in New Zealand. [2 pages]

Submission Content
We have been watching some of your proceedings from earlier months via Hansard TV recently and are most impressed with the depth and sincerity of your deliberations. Your well-versed presenters have also helped to clarify some of the issues surrounding the various families of electoral systems.

Democracy in this province (and in this country) needs to evolve into a more representational format, away from majority rule by one of, usually, two strong parties, away from wild policy swings and away from alienation of (mostly young) voters.

We are in favour of moving to a Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) voting system similar to that recommended by the Law Commission of Canada for our country that which has been implemented in New Zealand. Some positive points include:

  • Simplicity of two ballots
  • Every vote would translate positively
  • Little chance of an ineffective (or absent) opposition
  • Better quality and balance of legislation
  • A more consensus-building and teamwork style atmosphere in government
Obviously some issues such as thresholds (4-5% ?) and constituency size (increase by 30-35% ?) would have to be addressed in order that MMP fits our BC requirements. Party lists should be constructed with an eye to balanced representation (region, rural/urban, gender, minorities, etc.) and in an open manner, perhaps with voter or party grassroots participation. These and other elements of fine-tuning should be decided always keeping in mind the basic premise of fairness of the proportional representation system.

There is a fear of loss of regional representation under MMP (to which we in the rural, remote communities can relate), with larger constituencies being created to allow for party lists within our current 79 seat legislative cap. It has been shown that representation can be maintained (or even improved) through balanced party lists created by a transparent process under clear regulations.

To the fear of minority or coalition government instability argument we would say that there are many examples of stable governments being created under MMP, certainly as stable as what we are currently experiencing in our province. After all, what is stability?

It is time to move forward with the fairness of a proportional representation system used by a majority of the world’s democracies. You have an opportunity to create a milestone in Canadian political history – the eyes of the country are upon you.

Best wishes in your deliberations

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy